Uncemented hip revision cup as an alternative for T-type acetabular fractures: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The current rise in elderly patients with compromised bone quality complicates the surgical treatment of acetabular T-type fractures (AO type 62B2 fractures). There is on ongoing discussion about the treatment options, mostly consisting of an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with or without primary or secondary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Yet, these patients are oftentimes unable to fulfil weight-bearing restrictions and mostly present with an unavailability of a stable anchor site. Consequently, this study investigates the feasibility of a cementless hip revision cup for acetabular T-type fractures and compares its biomechanical properties to ORIF. HYPOTHESIS: The cementless hip revision cup provides sufficient biomechanical stability under the simulation of full weight-bearing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study compared two groups of human cadaveric hip bones with T-type fractures, of whom 6 subjects were treated with ORIF (6 male; mean age: 62±17years; mean body weight: 75±15) versus 6 subjects treated with a cementless hip revision cup (2 male; 69±12 years; 73±15kg). The group-assignment was controlled for comparable BMD results (mean BMD: ORIF 110±37 mg Ca-Ha/mL versus hip revision cup 134±32 mg Ca-Ha/mL). To compare for biomechanical stability cyclic loading was applied measuring the force and dislocation of the fracture gap at standardized bone loci using an all-electric testing machine and a 3D-ultrasound measuring system. RESULTS: Comparing superior pubic ramus versus iliac wing (cementless hip revision cup versus ORIF [mean±standard deviation]: 5.8±2.0 versus 7.0±3.2; p=0.032) as well as sacral ala versus iliac wing (4.6±2.2 versus 6.4±3.7; p=0.002), the cementless revision cup achieved a significantly higher stability than the plate osteosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Revision cup and ORIF withstood biomechanical loading forces exceeding full weight-bearing in this biomechanical study. The results of our study suggest that the cementless hip revision cup might be promising alternative to the current standard care of ORIF with or without primary THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case control experimental study.

Minimally invasive screw fixation is as stable as anterior plating in acetabular T-Type fractures - a biomechanical study.

INTRODUCTION: Operative treatments of T-type acetabular fractures are challenging surgical procedures. Open reduction and internal fixation is the standard method for the operative management of these fractures, however this is associated with high blood loss, long hospital stay and longer rehabilitation. Anterior subcutaneous pelvic fixation (internal fixation=INFIX) and retrograde pubic screw fixation have shown promising results in minimally invasive treatment of pelvic ring fractures. For T-type acetabular fractures, however, minimally invasive treatment concepts are still rare. Therefore we performed a mechanical in vitro study to: - investigate the potential favorability of minimally invasive treatment options over the already established open anterior locking plate osteosynthesis of acetabular T-fractures regarding biomechanical stability and post-surgical stiffness; - explore the biomechanical feasibility of the INFIX; - assess its potential ability to reduce the anterior acetabular column. HYPOTHESIS: A minimally invasive treatment of acetabular T-type fractures is biomechanically equivalent to an open anterior plate osteosynthesis. METHODS: Twenty-four synthetic hemipelvis specimens with a T-type acetabular fracture were divided in four groups. A posterior column screw was placed in every pelvis of every group. The anterior column was fixed with: - anterior column screw; - anterior column screw incl. INFIX; - INFIX alone; - 14-hole angular stable locking plate (standard fixation method). Displacement of the anterior column was reduced in group 2+3 using the INFIX. All specimens were cyclically loaded with 200N until a maximum of 600N. Movement/displacement of the fracture fragments were detected with a 3D-ultrasound measuring system. Displacement (mm) and Stiffness (N/mm) of the construction were analyzed. RESULTS: Statistical assessment showed no significant differences between the four fixation types (p>0.05). The 14-whole locking plate (group 4) displayed the overall highest stability with a displacement of 1.3±0.04mm and stiffness of 76.3±2.4N/mm. Anterior screw fixation (group 1) proved to be the minimally invasive fixation method with the least displacement and highest stiffness (1.5±0.2mm, 68.3±6.8N/mm). The combination of an INFIX and an anterior column screw (group 2), showed a mean stiffness of 62.1±6.0N/mm and a mean displacement of 1.7±0.2mm. INFIX only (group 3) presented a displacement of 1.6±0.1mm and a stiffness of 64.5±4.5N/mm. DISCUSSION: Minimally invasive fixation techniques for T-type acetabular fractures show promising biomechanical stability in non- or slightly displaced fractures. Furthermore, INFIX could be a feasible tool for the reduction of the anterior acetabular column. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control prospective experimental study.

Stability of capsule closure and postoperative anterior knee pain after medial parapatellar approach in TKA.

PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a widely discussed postoperative complication. In contrast to sports traumatology, the role of the dissected medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) using a medial parapatellar approach in TKA has not been discussed so far. In the present study, it was hypothesized that the attempted repair of the MPFL in TKA by simple closure of the joint capsule may not be successful in some cases, causing anterior knee pain. Furthermore, it was hypothesized, that the success of repair might be influenced by femoral component rotation. METHODS: Forty patients received their TKA in a ligament-balanced and forty patients in a conventional measured-resection technique. After implantation of the TKA using a medial parapatellar approach, two titan clips were attached on both sides of the capsule incision. 3 days and 3 months after surgery, the dehiscence of the two clips was measured on skyline patella radiographs; additionally patellar tilt, shift, the Knee Society Score and the Feller Score were obtained. RESULTS: 48 patients showed an increase of capsule dehiscence. Patients with a capsule dehiscence of more than 4 mm showed significantly less improvement in the Feller score 3 months postoperatively than patients with a capsule dehiscence ≤4 mm. Regarding the radiological measurements and the clinical outcome, no significant difference between the ligament-balanced and the measured-resection group was found. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that the successful repair of the MPFL after using a medial parapatellar approach in TKA could reduce the high rate of postoperative anterior knee pain. Furthermore, the appearance of capsule dehiscence and anterior knee pain does not seem to be dependent on the used operative technique.